RESEARCH

Turn research into better decisions

Good UX research isn't about producing a report. It's about reducing uncertainty before an organization commits to a direction. I combine user feedback, behavioral data, analytics, surveys, prototypes, and direct observation to find where an experience breaks down, then use that evidence to decide what should change.

CONTEXThopkinsmedicine.org
METHODSUsability testing, survey analysis, session review, analytics
PROJECTSFaceted Search, Wayfinding, Personas
PROJECT 1

Faceted Search: finding the right doctor

Getting visitors to make appointments is a primary business objective, and the physician profiles are among the most heavily trafficked areas of the site. Survey comments said it was hard to find the right provider. The search already had faceted filtering, but the controls didn't stand out enough for users to notice them or understand how to use them. The question wasn't whether facets should exist. It was how they should work.

Testing was a new step in this environment, so I made the case for it and got approval from my manager. I defined the scenarios and questions, designed two competing approaches (open and closed facets), built the prototype, and set the test methodology. A third party ran the sessions using my designs and protocol. I then reviewed the findings with my manager, agreed on a direction, and presented the results to the director and senior director.

WHAT TESTING SHOWED

Users scan results first, then filter

ROUND 1 · 8 USERS

Open facets performed slightly better. Users preferred closed.

Open facets felt busier and less relevant. Closed facets felt focused and organized. Mobile was harder than desktop, and the "narrow your results" control had low affordance on mobile.

THE INSIGHT

Results are part of the filtering experience

Users tended to scan results before touching any filter, and many wanted to enter multiple search terms up front. Filtering was secondary, so the results themselves shaped how users judged the tool.

THE CHANGES

Closed facets, clearer control

I switched to closed facets, renamed "narrow your results" to "refine your results," improved the control's affordance, and visually separated the title from the interactive facets.

ROUND 2 · TASK RESULTS

More passes, fewer struggles

Mobile passes rose from 2 of 8 to 5 of 8, and mobile failures fell from 2 to 1. Desktop passes rose from 3 of 8 to 5 of 8, and desktop struggles fell from 5 to 1.

OUTCOME

From testing to the live site

Faceted search was implemented in the physician profiles search after testing. Because appointments are completed in MyChart, the website can't see the full conversion path, so I tracked success partly through user comments about difficulty finding providers.

What I contributed: research strategy, scenarios, prototype, test design and protocol, analysis, iteration, and experience recommendations.

PROJECT 2

Wayfinding on a 15,000-page site

On a site with roughly 15,000 live pages, users could move between sections through navigation, links, and callouts without realizing where they had landed. Site-survey data showed that orientation was affecting satisfaction at scale.

I combined survey comments, recorded sessions, previous/next-page analytics, and navigation scores to find patterns. Two root causes emerged: users lacked persistent indicators of where they were, and navigation exposed only two levels even when the underlying hierarchy was much deeper.

I then designed and tested tasks around knowing where you are, navigating to a destination, and recovering from an orientation problem. The resulting direction introduced persistent sub-site headers and more focused section-level navigation, giving visitors a stronger sense of place without adding visual complexity.

What I contributed: research synthesis, problem definition, task design, prototype direction, testing, and information architecture.

PROJECT 3

Personas built from a year of survey data

For hopkinsmedicine.org, I analyzed a full year of mobile and desktop survey data to identify the primary visitor segments, their tasks, their expectations, and the environment they were in. The personas combine user, task, and environmental profiles instead of relying on demographics alone.

The goal was practical: give teams a shared reference point for design decisions based on probable user behavior rather than stakeholder assumptions.

HOW I WORK

Research when the decision is uncertain

I don't treat research as a ceremonial step. I use it when a decision is uncertain, when stakeholders are making assumptions, or when choosing the wrong direction would be costly. The leadership value is knowing what needs to be investigated, designing the right way to investigate it, and turning the findings into a decision the organization can act on.

KEEP READING
Make complex systems easier to use

Appointment making, structured content, and designing for multiple audiences.

Read this page →
Design for scale and enable the people who build it

Editor design systems, reusable content, and documentation.

Read this page →
CONTACT

Let's talk about your next decision.

Get in touch →